
Selecting the right subject matter experts (SMEs) is one of the most substantial decisions a credentialing program can make. SMEs shape everything from practice analyses and test content to standard setting and scoring decisions, making their selection foundational to exam validity, fairness, and defensibility.
As discussed during Quadterion’s Coffee & Credentials: SME Selection Secrets session, effective SME recruitment is not about finding the most available or well-known experts. It’s about intentional design, alignment with purpose, and disciplined documentation.
A consistent message from the Quadterion team was that a SME panel’s purpose must drive its composition. Ian Hembry, principal psychometrician at Quadterion, emphasized that organizations should first clarify the mission of the credentialing program and the specific goal of the panel before identifying candidates. A practice analysis panel, for example, requires different expertise than an item-writing or standard-setting group.
When purpose is clearly defined up front, organizations are better positioned to identify which professional backgrounds, experience levels, and perspectives are relevant and avoid assembling panels that are misaligned with the work at hand.
Jim Henderson, former NCCA Chair and Quadterion Advisory Board member, reinforced that no single individual can represent an entire profession. Because practice evolves rapidly and varies across settings, panels, rather than individuals, are required to ensure accurate and current representation of the field.
Intentional panel design includes:
This approach aligns with accreditation expectations and strengthens the legal defensibility of credentialing decisions.
Several Quadterion panelists noted that bias in SME selection often enters quietly through overreliance on “people we know” or the repeated use of the same trusted volunteers. David Chen, senior psychometrician at Quadterion, pointed out that while familiar SMEs are often capable contributors, repeatedly drawing from the same pool can limit perspective and unintentionally exclude voices that reflect how practice is occurring across the profession.
Expanding recruitment strategies, such as leveraging professional networks, inviting recommendations, or rotating panel membership, can help organizations broaden perspectives while continuing to ensure expertise.
Educators and academics can be highly effective SMEs due to their subject knowledge, writing skills, and motivation to participate. However, as Dr. Henderson cautioned, their involvement in exam development requires careful boundaries. Exposure to live test content can create conflicts if not properly managed.
Mitigation strategies may include:
As Nathan Burns, exam development manager at Quadterion noted, conflicts of interest are not universal. They vary by panel purpose. Recognizing and addressing these differences is critical to maintaining exam integrity.

Across the discussion, documentation emerged as a cornerstone of effective SME recruitment. Dr. Hembry emphasized that organizations should document not only their recruitment plans, but also their outcomes, even when targets are not fully met.
Strong documentation includes:
As our experts made clear, credentialing programs are not expected to achieve perfection, but they are expected to demonstrate thoughtful planning, good-faith effort, and transparency.
Looking for assistance with your SME recruitment strategy?